ianoshea:

We’re all in so deep in Coliver and we are 4 episodes in

pray for us all

• 379 notes•reblog •
sleepydumpling:

lizakateisgreat:

wiinga:

thisgingersnapsback:

let’s see tumblr get as excited about this as they did the totally “inclusive” white ~feminine~ rendition
$20 says nope 

I like how intimidating they look. 

Reblogging again.

Too awesome not to reblog again.

sleepydumpling:

lizakateisgreat:

wiinga:

thisgingersnapsback:

let’s see tumblr get as excited about this as they did the totally “inclusive” white ~feminine~ rendition

$20 says nope 

I like how intimidating they look. 

Reblogging again.

Too awesome not to reblog again.

• 201,863 notes•reblog •

ghoulwiththedragontattooine:

tuck yourself in you better hold onto your teddy

it’s Nightmare on Elm Street

AND GUESS WHO’S PLAYIN FREDDY?

(a mix for monster girls)

(listen here)

• 6,573 notes•reblog •

huffingtonpost:

Are Nasty Comments Like These Keeping Women Out Of Science?

"It’s death by a thousand cuts. Every day you’re faced with some comment, some snide remark, some inability to get a name on a research paper. And with an accumulation of those experiences, women tend to walk with their feet."

Go here to read more infuriating stories about women in science. 

My aunt actually wanted me to go into Nursing and discouraged me from going into engineering because she said I will always have it hard in that field. And now that I’m working, I find that, to a degree it is true. Because bosses, who usually are guys, tend to choose a guy to do more of the analytical stuff over a girl. It doesn’t seem obvious at first but there is an equal amount of guys and girls in the team and every time there is something needed, they will always approach the guys first before the girls.

• 34,542 notes•reblog •

tilly-and-trxye:

your—majesty:

How to be forever alone - Tip Number 1

(x)

• 18,729 notes•reblog •

nosleeptilbushwick:

this is absolutely incredible

• 380,208 notes•reblog •
siddharthasmama:

distanceschmistance:

We went over this in Semantics
I have been perpetually angry ever since

no double standards there, nope, no blatant misogyny/woman shaming here, nuh uh, none at all.

siddharthasmama:

distanceschmistance:

We went over this in Semantics

I have been perpetually angry ever since

no double standards there, nope, no blatant misogyny/woman shaming here, nuh uh, none at all.

• 106,191 notes•reblog •
• 64,074 notes•reblog •
In the 1890s, when Freud was in the dawn of his career, he was struck by how many of his female patients were revealing childhood [sexual] victimization to him. Freud concluded that child sexual abuse was one of the major causes of emotional disturbances in adult women and wrote a brilliant and humane paper called “The Aetiology of Hysteria.” However, rather than receiving acclaim from his colleagues for his ground-breaking insights, Freud met with scorn. He was ridiculed for believing that men of excellent reputation (most of his patients came from upstanding homes) could be perpetrators of incest.
Within a few years, Freud buckled under this heavy pressure and recanted his conclusions. In their place he proposed the “Oedipus complex,” which became the foundation of modern psychology… Freud used this construct to conclude that the episodes of abuse his clients had revealed to him had never taken place; they were simply fantasies of events the women had wished for… This construct started a hundred-year history in the mental health field of blaming victims for the abuse perpetrated on them and outright discrediting of women’s and children’s reports of mistreatment by men.

― Lundy Bancroft

(via proletarianprincess)

read this carve it into your brains permanently etch it into your skulls r e a d  t h i s

(via miss-mizi)

i don’t know how to deal with this

(via transhumanisticpanspermia)

• 48,898 notes•reblog •

• 1,604 notes•reblog •
Themed by PIXIE-LIKE!